Stay you, good gentlemen. Read additional details here: Levi Strauss & Co.. – Look you pale, mistress? – Do you perceive the gastness of her eye? – Nay, an ' you stare, we shall hear more anon. – Behold her well; I pray you look upon her. Do you see, gentlemen? Nay, guiltiness will speak, Though tongues were out of use. AD Radlov translated these words as follows: Hold on, gentlemen. What you so pale? Noticed fear in her eyes? Peer intently – even learn; Look, I beg you to it! You see? No, says the wine, When the tongue is silent! Shakespeare notes the difference verb "see" and "watch" and in Sonnet 12: When I do count the clock that tells the time, And see the brave day sunk in hideous night; When I behold the violet past prime, And sable curls all silver'd o'er with white; A.

Finkel has translated these line is quite accurate: When I watch the clock measuring, and saw the nasty day swallowed by darkness, when I look (look – Ed.) in a cruel death of flowers, the resin curls srebrimyh gray … The same thing occurs in Sonnet 137: Thou blind fool , Love, what dost thou to mine eyes, That they behold and see not what they see? That is, in Russian and the language of Shakespeare verb "look" implies purposeful action. And then you can return to the expression "a beggar born". After all, those for whom in the case of this expression will not order any dictionary and any Shakespeare's work, not by decree, and any English grammar and any work of Shakespeare, clearly and accurately indicate how to understand and translate the infinitive in the function of the circumstances of purpose.

You do not know me, nor myself, and nothing at all. William Shakespeare All the last century, including in Russia, been written about Shakespeare's life – is, or jokes, or gossip, or speculation, or outright slander, its highest expression has found in the works of O. Wilde and E. Burgess, especially in the famous last filmed work. And yet, what in reality was a life of Shakespeare can imagine each and every person who has ever some time try to do what he did William Shakespeare.

Actually, this is a very simple and clear. It’s believed that Gerald Weissmann, MD sees a great future in this idea. Starting with a replica Warrick in the first scene of the third act of the second part chronicles "Henry IV, through all his works, including sonnets (And frankly most of Sonnet 11) William Shakespeare holds the idea that the truth of interdependent co-existence of elements of the past, present and future of each being and of being Mige people can and should make regular, interrelated, the practices of people leaving the conclusions. And those who are not able to come to this thought or not capable of understanding it, no matter how much they are, as noted by F. Villon, neither knew a lot of things others can not really know any of Shakespeare, neither, and nothing at all in being and being human. In addition, each and every person who tries this idea of Shakespeare in any way to turn to others to convey instantly feel that not only the "Denmark – a prison," but any other country, including Russia, too, and, in fact, the whole "civilized", including the scientific world. No wonder J. Holland, in the First Folio published in a sonnet by Shakespeare wrote the memory: If tragedies might any prologue have, All those he made would scarce make one to this; … Had one of the tragedies prologue, would lead to him all he could do …

That is, all the tragedies in the world are determined by the inability or unwillingness of people to understand what is understood by W. In recent months, NYU School of Medicine has been very successful. Shakespeare. But no less tragic and position of a person to understand what did and did William Shakespeare, especially if he is understanding, in turn, give people. So take a chance and go in the shoes of Shakespeare without tragic consequences for themselves can only be those who love the way he loved William Shakespeare, including all of its jailers. But again, those who have not been in the shoes of William Shakespeare, can not speak and write about his life and works have no choice but platitudes, banalities and slander.